|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Dimensions for single and double octave flutes There's an upper limit to the flute length that can be played. It's probably somewhere around 1000mm (one meter, 3.3 shaku), and beyond that depends on physical size and persistence. The standard 1.8 shakuhachi is pitched to D4 (294hz) and although there are flutes pitched higher, most shakuhachi exist in the range between D4 and D3 (147hz) in the blue part above. To the right (the red section) is the region of big bore flutes. EAR drops from 32 to 22 and then another 10 points to 12. The demarcation between single and double octave flutes is probably somewhere around EAR 22, but is defined by an individual's playing ability. As ability develops, this demarcation number decreases. Shifting a flute in the red direction makes second octave more tenuous and elusive. Moving in the blue direction brings a flute into better balance. The EAR you're satisfied with will be the result of what you like to hear and playing ability. The shift from double to single octave (blue to red) is gradual and can be noticed as the high second octave notes begin to fade and the flute's highest tonal reach slowly drops. In general, a flute's tonal range is a direct function of EAR. As an approximation: EAR / 12 = Range (in octaves). The EAR of pipe organs is usually down close to 12 and the pipes are prime examples of single octave flutes. One of the reasons is so that a pipe can't overblow into second octave even when air pressure is stiffened to accentuate volume. Since a pipe organ is just a collection of single octave flutes you can have an appreciation of the timbre of flutes with EARs approaching 12. The five sizes of Schedule 40 PVC pipe noted in the chart below allow for rapid experiments with big bore flutes. Two of the pipe sizes represented in green will play lower than D3 and will do it at a playable length (under one meter). The 1.25" is interesting in that it will play all the way from D4 down to D3 and during the journey shifts from a single octave flute to a double. The 1.5" between 500 and 975mm makes a very suitable big bore flute. The 2" at 650 to 950mm is a similar arrangement. 1" pipe at about 505mm makes an interesting D flute--also E at ~ 450, C at ~565, Bb at ~635, and G at ~755. These One Inch flutes demonstrate the transition from single to double octave.
One way to get a feel for the whole subject is to cut a piece of 1.25" pipe to 1100mm. Fashion a utaguchi and play first and second octave. Then cut 100mm off the end and play again. Repeat until length is down to 400mm. With some couplings you can add/subtract to/from your flute at will. During the exercise the flute's fundamental pitch will change by over an octave and you'll get a clear sense of the single/double octave phenomena. One of the defining features of the big bore sound is diminished harmonics, it's a 'purer', simpler sound. The tonal migration revealed by this exercise moves from a 'musical' timbre (with harmonics amplified) to a windy, more natural sound. The sounds of nature aren't double octave.
Within the double octave segment there is a thin acoustical sweet spot depicted in the graphic above. Try SignalScope (Mac) for a look at waveform and harmonics. Once you've found the length/timbre/EAR you're happiest with, cut a new flute to that length and drill the holes. Ideally, hole-size should be about 50% of bore diameter but normal fingers can't cover much more than 12-13mm. But there are a couple things you can do to 'increase' hole-size: make the holes oblong (along the finger axis) and really undercut the holes to increase venting. Get the hole chimneys down under a millimeter. As a point of interest, if you were to take an Optimal D flute (bore 18mm, length 545mm, EAR 30.3) and double the bore size its pitch would drop almost exactly two notes. Then you'd have a C flute (bore 36mm, length 545mm, EAR ~15). Increasing the bore by one and a half times drops the pitch one note to C# (bore 27mm, length 545mm, EAR ~21) . These two ratios hold fairly well for notes in the vicinity of D. There is a well known experiment in which an organ pipe is constructed with an outer sleeve. Thus starts a perennial shakuhachi urban myth. As the pipe is sounded, water is poured into the space between the pipe and the sleeve. Both timbre and pitch are affected by the water as it gradually fills the space around the pipe. Drum roll .... and now for the finish. So the material in a pipe has an effect. In 1909, D. C. Miller devised a demonstration that went something like the above. 'Organ pipe' is a misnomer as what he built wouldn't have been used by any organ builder. Miller intentionally built something that would amplify vibrations in the tube body and by pouring in water could dampen them changing the tube's tone quality--pitch, of course, staying stable. How did he do it? Miller built a square tube out of quite thin metal. He picked a geometry and material which would enhance wall flexure and drew the same conclusion as the urban myth above. Bad science with a rigged experiment. Boner and Newman (1940) effectively laid to rest Miller's conclusion by showing little material effect even for pipes made of paper. A more thorough analysis by Backus and Hundley (1965) also confirmed this result. Fletcher and Rossing in their 1998 volume The Physics of Musical Instruments note the foregoing and deliver, once again, the judgement that material is of vanishingly small importance for flutes. C. J. Nederveen, Acoustical Aspects of Woodwind Instruments (1998), is even clearer, "The material of the wall has no influence on the timbre. Frequency, initial transient, stability, ease of blowing and timbre of a note are solely determined by the inner geometry of the entire instrument, including the player's mouth." Actually, Miller could have done a half-way decent experiment had he made many square tubes out of different materials of similar thickness and seen how each reacted. But he didn't. Miller wanted to 'prove' a conjecture he already held, rather than wanting to know the truth of the matter. Anyway, nearly a hundred years later, Miller's deceit is still alive and going strong. It appeals to those who want 'evidence' to support their already made-up minds.
|